Jerimoth Hill, RI, US Highpoint #7, 01 February 2004.

Jerimoth Hill, Rhode Island lies at 812 feet MSL and is ranked #46 in elevation among US Highpoints. This was the 4th stop during my cross-country trip with Teewinot and “Nancy.” At the time of my visit, the landowners wouldn’t allow access, and the “acceptable” alternative was this high point on the highway, which is only a a couple hundred yards from the actual point and with negligible elevation difference.

Years later I would return when access was restored, making this one of two highpoints along with Wye East (Mt. Hood) that I have repeated to date.

“Nancy” and Teewinot at the roadside highpoint marker, “Nancy” jokingly showing a little leg.

From here I would head to Mount Greylock Massachusetts


3 April 2017 – 2nd Summit, first to actual highpoint

During a work trip to Boston, I re-visited Jerimoth as access had been restored. This would mark my 5th high point achieved on a work trip, after FL, HI, MI, and TX. As I also attempted Agiocochook (Mt. Washington) on the same trip, I happened to have my helmet and ice axe with me, making for what I consider a hilarious photo and also epitomizes my goofy character!

e easy walk from the highway to Jerimoth’s lofty Rhode Island summit.
The easy walk from the highway to Jerimoth’s lofty Rhode Island summit.
Jerimoth Hill summit Reference Marker. This is not a benchmark; note the arrow which points to the true summit. RM’s are frequently utilized when the point itself doesn’t have a durable surface in which to place a true summit (or corner, etc.) benchmark.
Jerimoth Hill Summit Benchmark
Jerimoth Hill Summit Benchmark. Note the point inside the triangle, demarcating this as the actual point, as opposed to the Reference Marker seen above.
Some odd structures near Jerimoth’s summit. What are these?
This rock visually appears to be the highest actual point, although the benchmark isn’t here.
RM #2
Information sign placed by the Highpointer’s Club as seen in 2017.

3 thoughts on “Jerimoth Hill, RI, US Highpoint #7, 01 February 2004.”

Leave a Comment